在上周六1月15日場托福線下考試的時候，出現了一道環(huán)保類的獨立寫作題目（多走路和騎單車；廢物循環(huán)利用；購買有機食品），根據學生反饋，考試整體的難度不大，之前也訓練過相應的話題，雖然不怎么難，但是這里我們還是想給大家說一下試題分析及寫作范文，給需要的同學們作一些備考參考。

原題：

Which one do you think is the most useful for individuals to do in their daily life to help improve the environment?

1.walking or bicycling to reduce driving a car;

2.recycling and reusing wastes instead of throwing them away;

3.buying locally grown organic foods(without pesticide);

這道題目屬于利弊分析，主要圍繞“個人保護環(huán)境”來展開寫作。思路提示：

1、三個選項之中，我們最容易嘗試和做到的選項是？為什么？
騎單車最好操作，結合生活實際

2、三個選項之中，有哪些做法相對不切實際？為什么？
廢物利用可能效果不好

托福獨立寫作范文：環(huán)保類話題

From where I stand, walking or bicycling should be the top priority in people's daily life in terms of environmental protection.

Firstly, both walking and riding bicycles help to decrease people’s use of private cars, thus reducing harmful gas emissions. These exhaust emissions can reduce the quality of the air, particularly in big cities that are congested with cars. If people can reduce such emissions, this would mean better air quality and less air pollution. A good case in point is what Guangzhou citizens did last year. Specifically, encouraged by local government officials, people from all walks of life actively chose to use shared bikes to commute to and from work. As it turned out, such practice on a large scale proved very effective in curbing noxious fumes and the sky became much clearer as a result.

Secondly, it is true that buying organic foods is environmentally friendly because these foods may not involve extensive use of pesticides. However, there is a critical factor that goes unnoticed: affordability. By that I mean, in some regions, organic foods tend to be more expensive and inaccessible than processed foods like cans. Seeing the high price tag may already discourage a large number of consumers from purchasing organic products. Worse, limited availability makes it even more difficult for the general public to change their diet by using organic foods. Therefore, the idea of consuming organic foods may seem theoretically feasible at best but impractical in reality.

……